Go Wide or Go Home

I have owned the renowned Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon since earlier this year.  It started my love affair with ultra wide lenses.  The Tokina is razor sharp, even wide open, and sports a 2.8 max aperture allowing for some creativity in low light.  I have really enjoyed it and it has become one of my three lenses that comes with me everywhere! 

Sigma introduced the widest lens for crop sensor cameras earlier this year...the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 lens.  On a Nikon crop sensor, this gives a 12mm field of view (in 35mm equivalent) which means I can now go even wider!  Needless to say, I recently purchased the Sigma 8-16mm lens to test head to head against the Tokina.  I'll be taking a trip to Alaska in May 2011, and I'm going to need the best ultra wide I can get for that trip!

I did a variety of tests on the Sigma and the Tokina and various apertures.  The biggest difference many may be interested in is the 8mm to 11mm difference.  It doesn't SOUND like that big of a difference, does it?  To test it out, I took the following two photos on a tripod with the same settings at 11mm on the Tokina and 8mm on the Sigma.  The first image shown below is the Tokina at 11mm, f/4.5, 1/640.  Below that you will see the Sigma at 8mm, f/4.5, 1/640.  Both of these photos are straight out of the camera (SOOC).  No editing has been done. 

Tokina 11-16mm @ 11mm, f/4.5, 1/640

Sigma 8-16mm @ 8mm, f/4.5, 1/640

That's some serious wideness, huh?  I have to say, I was expecting to see a small difference in the 8mm vs 11mm width but nothing as obvious as this.

One thing to keep in mind is that, at shooting at f/4.5 this is "wide open" for the Sigma lens, but f/4.5 is actually stopped down for the Tokina (since it has a max aperture of f/2.8).  In reality, you would expect the Tokina to perform even better than the Sigma.  As you can see, though, the Sigma has much better color and contrast SOOC than the Tokina.

The Sigma also has a shorter minimum focus distance than the Tokina, allowing for some creativity!  The Sigma has a minimum focus distance of 24cm (keep in mind, that distance is from the sensor and NOT from the front of the lens), and the Tokina has a minimum focus distance of 30cm.  That doesn't sound like a lot, but I have to say after trying out both lenses myself, there is most definitely a noticeable difference.

To demonstrate the close focusing ability...my dog Marley at 8mm.  Her nose was very close to the front glass!

The Tokina is always touted for its sharpness, but I found the Sigma to be equally sharp or sharper (after I received my second copy).  As with all lenses, there are bad copies out there.  The first Sigma 8-16mm lens I received from B&H backfocused and was pretty soft.  In addition, it suffered from some pretty severe CA.  After returning that lens to B&H and receiving a new copy, I've been thrilled with the lens.  My second copy was MUCH better!  It is sharp and has very little CA.  I didn't test CA specifically between the Tokina and Sigma, but I have read that the Sigma tends to have less CA than the Tokina, as well.  However, during my time of owning the Tokina, CA never proved to be an issue with it, so I wouldn't discount the Tokina for that reason.

I know I've raved about the Sigma, but I have to say...the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 is nothing to sneeze at!  It's a fantastic lens, as well.  If I had unlimited funds, I would have kept the Tokina AND the Sigma, but unfortunately I had to sell the Tokina to fund the Sigma.  The Tokina beats the Sigma with its 2.8 maximum aperture.  It works incredibly well in low light, and it is pretty darn sharp even wide open.  If you plan to shoot in low light a good bit, I would absolutely recommend the Tokina.

All in all, the Tokina and Sigma are two wonderful ultra wide angle lenses.  I chose to keep the Sigma 8-16 and sell the Tokina 11-16, and I absolutely adore my Sigma! 

At the time of this writing, the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 is priced at $599 and the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 is priced at $699.

If you have any questions about the lens, feel free to leave a comment and I will respond!

Care  – (January 5, 2011 at 12:29 PM)  

great post!! I love your Marley shot :)

Jen O.  – (January 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM)  

Great review, Melissa! thanks!

Jenn  – (January 5, 2011 at 2:36 PM)  

Great post! Gosh and I feel like the 11mm is SO wide compared to 18 which was the previous widest angle I could go...8 must be really fun! :)

Barb  – (January 5, 2011 at 5:06 PM)  

Love the review! Thanks! :)

James  – (January 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM)  

That Marley shot is what super wide angle is all about! Love the composition and exposure.

Jen  – (January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM)  

Love the comparison shots! Such great examples! I would love to play around with either of these lenses!!

Glinda  – (January 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM)  

Soooo...cool. I love that shot of Marley more than anything.=D

Unknown  – (January 26, 2011 at 6:13 PM)  

WOW! That lens is so wide yoou can almost see yourself! Great review!

Anonymous –   – (January 31, 2011 at 12:27 PM)  

best review available on this lense. people appreciate your great work. thank u

Anonymous –   – (May 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM)  

Thanks for the comparison, the extra 3mm from the 8-16mm sigma does make the Tokina look like shot taken from a basic 18-55mm lens.

Anonymous –   – (August 20, 2012 at 10:31 PM)  

Very concise and lucid review. Am grappling with the choice between these two lenses..

Jol Martyn-Clark  – (December 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM)  

Loved the Tokina until I saw the Sigma - Its the clouds that do it for me. Hasn't got the same effect on the T. - but... Both pretty good! Send me both!

Real Focus  – (December 21, 2012 at 7:09 AM)  

Cool! Good review.. happy shooting..

I usually use a 14mm Nikon Lens for my architectural work, need a wider lens so will go for the Sigma, seems like a keen lens with a good price tag!

Papa Nature  – (May 24, 2013 at 10:24 PM)  

OK, I am a little more sold on the Sigma, but I see the color and contrast as better in the Tokina shot, though the dry grass in the T shot looks pink. Don't know what color it really was. I am concerned with the inconsistency of Sigma's build, as I have a telephoto by Sigma and the sharpness is definitely lacking. I don't know if you took a shot at 11mm with the Sigma, but that would really help in the comparison. Thanks for the info though, it really is tipping me from what I thought I wanted. Dan

dimzPhotography  – (September 9, 2013 at 1:33 AM)  

amazing the great distortion wide lenses from sigma, nice and sharp Thanks for review, it was excellent and very informative.
thank you :)

Anonymous –   – (September 24, 2013 at 4:35 PM)  

This is easily the most useful review of Tokina vs Sigma UWA lenses that I've found. I had been leaning toward Tokina, but this convinced me that Sigma is the only choice for me. Thank you!

Post a Comment

About Me

My photo
- I always have a camera, and I take too many photos - I can't carry a tune, but I love to sing - I prefer meatless, but I'm not a vegetarian - I think ice cream makes the world go round - I watch too much TV - I can sleep all day if allowed - I can name that tune in five notes (if we're listening to a country station)

Contact Me

I offer prints (including fine art canvas prints) of all nature and wildlife photos you may see on this blog or on my Flickr site.

I also allow licensing of my photos. All of my work is copyrighted. Please do not use any of my photos without my permission. Please contact me if you are interested in licensing my photos for your use.

Contact me for more information: MLHScott@gmail.com